Hi Alvaro Thank you for your review and comments.
See PPE below for my responses On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 5:14 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > In general, I like the charter. However, I have some questions/comments: > > (1) What’s the difference between the work items in “Part 1” and the ones > in “Part 2”? > PPE - originally we had in part 1 work that were promised and part 2 grouping work in progress. Will fix the document and remove the "part" for clarity. > (2) Related. I’m assuming that the headers “Proposed Charter…” will be > deleted. > PPE - Yes. It was left as "Proposed" in this version so it is clear it is still under review. > (3) Multicast support. It’s not clear from the description if the work is > just to merge the experimental RFCs or if there’s something else. ? > > PPE: It was proposed to merge the experimental RFCs RFC6831 & RFC8378. However, how they are used in Replication List entries is in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vda-lisp-underlay-multicast-trees/. It is still open if all three docs should be merged in a big document or preferable to have several docs. It would be great to hear feedback from the WG. (4) LISP Applicability. How will "the most recent and relevant use-cases” > be determined? I don’t think we need to answer, but the question may come > up later in the process. > > PPE- The spirit of this statement is to document only novel use cases that are significantly different from the original LISP use case and avoid a multitude of small incremental use cases. "Novel" may also be vague, open to suggestions. (5) Maybe reorder the work items to coincide with the order of the > milestones. > PPE - Good catch, will do. > > (6) "LISP geo-coordinates” doesn’t map to a work item. > PPE - We were planning to have this under the mobility umbrella. We can add some text to make it more explicit. I don’t have write access to the repo, so I’m attaching diffs with some > editorial points. > PPE - ok will go over them and merge. Thanks Padma > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > On October 1, 2023 at 1:46:22 PM, Padma Pillay-Esnault ( > padma.i...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Hello all, > > We have created a repository to gather input for the proposed LISP WG > charter presented in our last meeting. > > A pointer to the repo below > https://github.com/lisp-wg/wg-charter > > We welcome your comments and contributions. > > Thanks > Padma and Luigi > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > lisp@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list lisp@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
