Ron Guilmette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote among other things: > On the receiving end, sites which receive mail to some large number of their > users (say 20 or more) at about the same time from a given IP address would > check the message after the first 20 for the presence of a valid X-Opt-In: Here's a weak point of your proposal IMHO... Someone would write a tool for spammers to allow them to send out their spam with bogus orginating IP addresses (using IP spoofing). -- Norbert Bollow, Zuerich, Switzerland Backup E-mail address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Churchplanters E-mail conference, see http://genesis.acu.edu/cplant/
- Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. David W. Tamkin
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ken Hooper
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. murr rhame
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Daniel Reed
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Det... Daniel Reed
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Norbert Bollow
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. murr rhame
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Norbert Bollow
- RE: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Kief Morris
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Daniel Reed
- Re: [spamtools] Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Albert Lunde
- Re: [spamtools] Spam Filtering and Messy Deta... Ronald F. Guilmette
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Stan Ryckman
- Re: Spam Filtering and Messy Details. Ronald F. Guilmette
