On 4/30/01 10:48 AM, Tom Neff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... >--On Monday, April 30, 2001 8:37 AM -0700 Chuq Von Rospach ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 4/30/01 8:24 AM, "Tom Neff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> From an ISP standpoint, what really matters about spam is the number of >>> recipients. The really noticeable difference between a legitimate >>> mailing list and a spam campaign is that the latter is HUGE. >> >> That's not a safe assumption, Tom. There are huge, legitimate mailing >> lists as well. > >But wait, what does "huge" mean? How big are you thinking? The biggest >listserv I know of is TESL-L which has about 12,000 members. [EMAIL PROTECTED], the second-largest public LISTSERV list in existence, has 2,139,878 subscribers. I would assume by its name and description that virtually all of them are on AOL. [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] both have primarily AOL audiences and have 443,904 and 289,032 subscribers, respectively. I'm not sure what my point is. -- Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Finger/Web for PGP [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.lull.org/adam/
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it David W. Tamkin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
- RE: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Rick Rountree
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it J C Lawrence
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Adam Bailey
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it JC Dill
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Stan Ryckman
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it JC Dill
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Norbert Bollow
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Sharon Tucci
