--On Monday, April 30, 2001 2:26 PM -0400 John R Levine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's what's known these days as a small list. There are many legitimate > lists with hundreds of thousands of addresses. Infobeat's daily news > summary is reputed to have over a million. [and several others made similar comments] As I remarked to Chuq privately, I was really thinking of discussion forums. We all receive E-newsletters that must number in the millions. I would actually be in favor of regulating those a bit more.
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it David W. Tamkin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
- RE: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Rick Rountree
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it J C Lawrence
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Mitch Collinsworth
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Adam Bailey
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it JC Dill
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Stan Ryckman
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it John R Levine
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Tom Neff
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it JC Dill
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Norbert Bollow
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it James M Galvin
- Re: we aren't the enemy, but it's hard to prove it Sharon Tucci
