Hi All,
I came across this article the another day, and throught that you all might find it useful, as well :)) Joe Cervenka The average web site contains a mix of text and images throughout its pages, and may or may not offer files for download. The average web site also gets average traffic, meaning anywhere from 50-500 visitors per day. Assuming these factors, a hosting plan with anywhere from 3-5 gigabytes (GB) of data transfer per month should suffice. For sites that get more than 500 visitors per day, or those that offer numerous large files for download, it may be wise to secure a hosting plan with 50 gigabytes of data transfer per month - or more. It is important to note that most web hosts quote your allotted bandwidth in "per month" terms, when in fact that number is actually broken down to a "per day" limit. For example: one web site of mine has 125GB of allotted bandwidth/data transfer per month. Sounds like a lot doesn't it? It is. However, in reality that equates to about 4.2GB of bandwidth per day. One day, several months ago, I made a large (12 megabyte) video available for download on this web site. It received over 400 downloads within the first two hours! That amounted to 4800 megabytes (MB) of data transfer, or 4.8 gigabytes. You guessed it, I exceeded my daily bandwidth allowance and my site was disabled for 24 hours. Lesson learned? Either order more bandwidth or adjust my web site content to fall within my bandwidth limitations. Not wanting to pony up the dough and purchase more bandwidth, I removed the video. --- Tim Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, DEFINITELY up the RAM (I'm amazed that 300 > websites are running at all > on 512 megs), and after that the reason I had the > same problem was the heap > size settings. There is a Macromedia member > nicknamed Sarge (I think his > real last name is Sargent) whose personal site had > good guidelines for > configuring your heap size. Google "sarge coldfusion > heap" or something like > that. > > If you can do it, boost the server to 2 gigs of Ram, > but 1 gig at bare > minimum. > > >From: "Daniel Elmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: <[email protected]> > >Subject: RE: jrun > >Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:25:27 -0500 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from iserver40.infranet > ([207.168.61.195]) by mc10-f1.hotmail.com > >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 24 May > 2005 11:30:46 -0700 > >Received: from nospam.imailbox.com (unverified > [207.168.61.211]) by > >imailbox.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.2.5) with SMTP id > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for > <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 > >13:35:48 -0500 > >Received: from mx10.imailbox.com > ([207.168.61.213])by nospam.imailbox.com > >(8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4OIPG85014980for > <[email protected]>; Tue, > >24 May 2005 13:25:16 -0500 > >Received: from medworking.com (mail.medworking.com > [64.5.36.39])by > >mx10.imailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id > 57605474for <[email protected]>; > >Tue, 24 May 2005 17:03:47 -0500 (CDT) > >Received: from planform2 [71.96.82.250] by > medworking.com with ESMTP > >(SMTPD32-8.15) id ADE94130108; Tue, 24 May 2005 > 13:09:45 -0500 > >X-Message-Info: > TI+g33lC1uNvHOa6zpOr1THPmz2WRZN7J1M0xkdh9Ig= > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 > (9.0.2910.0) > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE > V6.00.2800.1165 > >X-imailbox.com-MailScanner-Information: > http://www.imailbox.com/support.cfm > >for more info... > >X-imailbox.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean > >X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2005 18:30:46.0360 > (UTC) > >FILETIME=[B3883D80:01C5608E] > > > >Why can't you spend $50 on a 1/2 gig stick and > double your RAM. Sounds like > >JRun is using what it needs, it's not out of > control. > > > >What are you max and min heap sizes set too in the > CF Admin? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Behalf > >Of Kevin Fricke > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:19 PM > > To: CFLIST > > Subject: jrun > > Importance: High > > > > > > I know that this has been discussed a number of > times on this and other > >boards/newsgroups. I have looked through all of > the forums, etc. at > >www.macromedia.com and I just need a bit more > detailed information. If > >anyone can help I will be grateful. > > > > We have a server that has 300 websites that are > all pulling data from > >the > >same database, plus the admin. Over the last few > months we have needed to > >restart cf several times due to the huge load that > jrun takes up. Now it > >is > >out of control. Jrun is currently at 427 MB of > memory usage. > > > > What should JRun be using? Is there anything > that I can do other than > >upgrading the server to fix this issue??? > > > > We are running CF 6.1 on Windows 2000 with 1/2 > GB Ram. > > > > > > Please help! > > > > > > Kevin Fricke > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > To post, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe: > http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm > To subscribe: > > http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new Resources site http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/ ---------------------------------------------------------- To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm To subscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
