Third vote for more RAM--512MB for running that number of sites just likely isn't going to be enough.
Matt On 5/24/05, Tim Fitzpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yeah, DEFINITELY up the RAM (I'm amazed that 300 websites are running at all > on 512 megs), and after that the reason I had the same problem was the heap > size settings. There is a Macromedia member nicknamed Sarge (I think his > real last name is Sargent) whose personal site had good guidelines for > configuring your heap size. Google "sarge coldfusion heap" or something like > that. > > If you can do it, boost the server to 2 gigs of Ram, but 1 gig at bare > minimum. > > >From: "Daniel Elmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [email protected] > >To: <[email protected]> > >Subject: RE: jrun > >Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 13:25:27 -0500 > >MIME-Version: 1.0 > >Received: from iserver40.infranet ([207.168.61.195]) by mc10-f1.hotmail.com > >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 24 May 2005 11:30:46 -0700 > >Received: from nospam.imailbox.com (unverified [207.168.61.211]) by > >imailbox.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 5.2.5) with SMTP id > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 May 2005 > >13:35:48 -0500 > >Received: from mx10.imailbox.com ([207.168.61.213])by nospam.imailbox.com > >(8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4OIPG85014980for <[email protected]>; Tue, > >24 May 2005 13:25:16 -0500 > >Received: from medworking.com (mail.medworking.com [64.5.36.39])by > >mx10.imailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57605474for <[email protected]>; > >Tue, 24 May 2005 17:03:47 -0500 (CDT) > >Received: from planform2 [71.96.82.250] by medworking.com with ESMTP > >(SMTPD32-8.15) id ADE94130108; Tue, 24 May 2005 13:09:45 -0500 > >X-Message-Info: TI+g33lC1uNvHOa6zpOr1THPmz2WRZN7J1M0xkdh9Ig= > >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) > >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 > >X-imailbox.com-MailScanner-Information: http://www.imailbox.com/support.cfm > >for more info... > >X-imailbox.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean > >X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2005 18:30:46.0360 (UTC) > >FILETIME=[B3883D80:01C5608E] > > > >Why can't you spend $50 on a 1/2 gig stick and double your RAM. Sounds like > >JRun is using what it needs, it's not out of control. > > > >What are you max and min heap sizes set too in the CF Admin? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Behalf > >Of Kevin Fricke > > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 1:19 PM > > To: CFLIST > > Subject: jrun > > Importance: High > > > > > > I know that this has been discussed a number of times on this and other > >boards/newsgroups. I have looked through all of the forums, etc. at > >www.macromedia.com and I just need a bit more detailed information. If > >anyone can help I will be grateful. > > > > We have a server that has 300 websites that are all pulling data from > >the > >same database, plus the admin. Over the last few months we have needed to > >restart cf several times due to the huge load that jrun takes up. Now it > >is > >out of control. Jrun is currently at 427 MB of memory usage. > > > > What should JRun be using? Is there anything that I can do other than > >upgrading the server to fix this issue??? > > > > We are running CF 6.1 on Windows 2000 with 1/2 GB Ram. > > > > > > Please help! > > > > > > Kevin Fricke > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > To post, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe: > http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm > To subscribe: > http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm > > > -- Matt Woodward [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mattwoodward.com ---------------------------------------------------------- To post, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm To subscribe: http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
