>I understand the situation very well, Mikki. What I was working towards was >a useful series of responses from C. Gomes that could be used as evidence >for your thesis. I won't be able to elicit those statements from him if you >cram the answers down his throat. Please try to hold back a little. NSI knows the situation very well. NSI's dispute policy is the least of our problems at this point (although it most definitely is a problem).
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Craig Simon
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Martin B. Schwimmer
- NSI discouraging things (was RE: [ifwp] NSI D... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: [ifw... Craig Simon
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: [ifw... Greg Skinner
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: ... Bill Lovell
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: ... Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Bill Lovell
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispu... Bill Lovell
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Michael Sondow
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- Benefits of NSI's policy (was RE: [ifwp] NSI ... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Dave Crocker
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Roeland M.J. Meyer
