Mikki Barry a écrit:
> 
> >I understand the situation very well, Mikki. What I was working towards was
> >a useful series of responses from C. Gomes that could be used as evidence
> >for your thesis. I won't be able to elicit those statements from him if you
> >cram the answers down his throat. Please try to hold back a little.
> 
> NSI knows the situation very well.  NSI's dispute policy is the least of
> our problems at this point (although it most definitely is a problem).

I wonder if you quite understand the importance of NSI's statistics,
although it would seem from your previous post that you do. All that is
needed to put those statistics in perspective are responses from NSI to the
questions so graciously posed on our behalf (though unwittingly, one must
assume, unless he has decided to betray his employers) by Martin Schwimmer.
By supplying the conclusion before the evidence is assembled, you inhibit
the submission of it. Let us hope that Mr. Gomes will respond regardless. As
a certain British jurist once remarked, friendly witnesses are to be
encouraged, not pushed :)

Reply via email to