Carl Oppedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >One must not forget that Mr. Gomes has an advantage over all of the >rest of us -- he is with NSI, which conducts these "invocations" in >fiercely protected secrecy. If the public could review these >"invocations" the way it can study the actions of ordinary courts, >the public could consider whether the invocations were fair or not, >and whether they do or do not discourage things. I agree with this assessment, and would like to call upon NSI to disclose its rulings to the public. If NSI is to act with the powers of a court, then it should be held to the standards that courts are held to, in my opinion. --gregbo
- [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Craig Simon
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Martin B. Schwimmer
- NSI discouraging things (was RE: [ifwp] N... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: ... Craig Simon
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was RE: ... Greg Skinner
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was... Bill Lovell
- Re: NSI discouraging things (was... Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute St... Bill Lovell
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispu... Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name D... Bill Lovell