>Mikki, > >Another observation might be that the much maligned and >disliked NSI dispute policy might actually discourage >cybersqatters from going after trademarked names because >they know the mark holders can invoke the policy. If this >is true, it could possibly be concluded that cybersquatters >are focusing more on non-trademarked names. Possible, yes, but can one truly "cybersquat" if the name isn't trademarked?
- Re: A little off topic Craig Simon
- Re: A little off topic Greg Skinner
- Re: A little off topic Michael Dillon
- Re: A little off topic: was ... Greg Skinner
- Re: A little off topic: was ... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: A little off topic: was ... Greg Skinner
- Re: A little off topic: was ... jeff Williams
- Re: A little off topic: was NSI ... Michael Sondow
- ...it would be better if the... Bob Allisat
- NSI's definition of cybersquatting (was R... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Martin B. Schwimmer
- No drastic changes in DNS needed? (was Re: [i... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Bill Lovell
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Dave Crocker
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats William X. Walsh