At 09:50 AM 2/2/99 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I would say yes.  Cybersquating restricted to trademarked
>names only?  I think not.  There are some very desirable
>names that are too generic to trademark but they could still
>have high value.  Maybe my definition of cybersquating is
>broader than most.
>
>Chuck

Okay, let's get this straight -- somebody might have a desirable name that
is too generic to trademark, yet that still has high value.  Somebody
registers, say, "veronica.org" because she is named "Veronica".  Yet NSI
would still cut off the domain name if somebody with a trademark (the comic
book company) presented it to NSI for a challenge?  No need to answer, we
know the answer is yes, NSI would cut it off.

Yes, your (NSI's) definition of cybersquatting is indeed broader than most.


Reply via email to