>On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 08:42:16PM -0500, Mikki Barry wrote: >> >> Sorry, but when an organization does not ASK its membership for its >> opinions on an issue it cannot claim to represent them. > >A vast generality that can't possibly be true. Your congressperson >can legitimately claim to represent you, even though they don't ask >your opinion on every thing they vote on. Big difference between an governmental official, elected by the populace, and a membership organization that claims to "speak for" vast numbers of people, yet never either asks them their view, nor produces their draft views for membership comment prior to statements.
- RE: [IFWP] drj response to Kent -- long Antony Van Couvering
- Re: [IFWP] drj response to Kent -- long Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] drj response to Kent -- long Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] drj response to Kent -- long Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Bob Allisat
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] Timely decisions Michael Dillon
