>See the Glaxo-Wellcome case from the UK, the Payline case in France, and >the Orkin case from Canada and see if that changes your view. These rights >regard protection of the trademark right, they do not "exist solely with >regard to the USAGE of the domain name." In the US they do, and last I heard, international laws have not yet amended the Lanham Act. > >In any event, no one denies that there are defenses to tm infringement, and >no one other than NSI advocates any type of proceeding that limits the DN >owner's right to assert defenses, so your listing of the various defenses >to infringement is besides the point. That doesn't address the main point that domain name holders have legitimate rights besides those that may be grounded in trademark or unfair competition torts.
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Mark R. Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Diane Cabell
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Fail... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Mikki Barry
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Fail... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure ... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Fail... Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure David Schutt
- Re: [IFWP] Market Structure Failure Ellen Rony