>See the Glaxo-Wellcome case from the UK, the Payline case in France, and
>the Orkin case from Canada and see if that changes your view.  These rights
>regard protection of the trademark right, they do not "exist solely with
>regard to the USAGE of the domain name."

In the US they do, and last I heard, international laws have not yet
amended the Lanham Act.
>
>In any event, no one denies that there are defenses to tm infringement, and
>no one other than NSI advocates any type of proceeding that limits the DN
>owner's right to assert defenses, so your listing of the various defenses
>to infringement is besides the point.

That doesn't address the main point that domain name holders have
legitimate rights besides those that may be grounded in trademark or unfair
competition torts.


Reply via email to