See below.

At 10:03 AM 1/11/99 -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
>On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
>
>> Charlie's observation at the Boston ICANN meeting was that the ICANN
>> board, coming from the corporate world, did now know how to operate
>> in an open environment.
>
>I love transcripts. From the Boston meeting with thanks to the Berkman
>Center(http://cyber.harvard.edu/icann/archive/transtransparency.html):
>
>          MR. NESSON:  Well, may I interpret the
>
>             4      question and see if I can elicit something more
>
>             5      from it from the Board?  The question is, how
>
>             6      comfortable are you actually operating in the
>
>             7      open?  And it can be carried through not just to a
>
>             8      question of corporate minutes and corporate
>
>             9      meetings, but to your full role as director of the
>
>            10      corporation.  In a sense, openness is part of the
>
>            11      art of living, in some way.  So, for example, I
>
>            12      find that my e-mail is a key part of the actual
>
>            13      transactional world that I'm now in, and I feel
>
>            14      that ICANN, if you're doing the job, is doing
>
>            15      something historical.
>
>            16                 So the question would be, at what point
>
>            17      does your e-mail get archived and become public? 
>
>            18      At what point do we see the thought process that
>
>            19      actually goes into whatever that screen is that
>
>            20      requires just enough delay to be practical, and
>
>            21      how fully does the screen come down?  Who wants to
>
>            22      answer?



At this point MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK's face appeared on a 12 foot high
video screen; he was visibly disturbed.


>            23                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  Well, I can try to
>
>            24      answer it, at least in part.  I do not agree that

>             1      the Board, up to now (inaudible) the adoption of
>
>             2      the by-laws, and you will find both (inaudible)
>
>             3      you'll find the reasoning of our decisions and the
>
>             4      reasoning behind (inaudible).  If you would insist
>
>             5      on total transparency, which, to me, then would
>
>             6      mean that every Board meeting would have to be
>
>             7      (inaudible) of secretive meetings --
>
>             8                 AUDIENCE:  Why?
>
>             9                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  Why?  Because a
>
>            10      decision-making process cannot be done in full
>
>            11      public.
>
>            12                 AUDIENCE:  What?
>
>            13                 AUDIENCE:  Why?
>
>            14                 AUDIENCE:  What?
>
>            15                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  The United States
>
>            16      government does not --
>
>            17                 AUDIENCE:  C-Span?
>
>            18                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  -- the United
>
>            19      States government does not meet in public.  The
>
>            20      executive meetings are not in public, at least
>
>            21      (inaudible).  The government reports on the
>
>            22      results and explains them reasonably.  And I
>
>            23      believe that's what's (inaudible), because the
>
>            24      Board is a body, the Board is not a collection of
>
>             1      individuals.  And what you (inaudible) have to
>
>             2      reckon with is that we came from many different
>
>             3      directions, from many regions in the world, even,
>
>             4      and even amongst ourselves, we have to have a
>
>             5      learning process to come to fully reasoned and
>
>             6      reasonable decisions.  So --
>
>             7                 MR. NESSON:  But Hans --
>
>             8                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  -- as I said -- as
>
>             9      I said before --
>
>            10                 MR. NESSON:  Hans --
>
>            11                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  -- you're asking
>
>            12      for the new clothes of the emperor, which is
>
>            13      running naked.
>
>            14                 MR. NESSON:  But Hans, isn't it just
>
>            15      possible that the learning process is exactly a
>
>            16      process of learning to live more in the open?
>
>            17                 MR. KRAAIJGNBRINK:  I think the
>
>            18      movement in this would be two ways.  I believe
>
>            19      that the -- I believe that the working of the
>
>            20      Board will be more transparent than it has been up
>
>            21      to today. 

Couldn't be less, now could it ?

Do people think it is more transparent that it was back then ?




--
"To find out what your opponent is up to, look at what he
says about you" - unknown



__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________

Reply via email to