In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bret A. Fau sett" writes: > It appears that my concern that ICANN might take action on WIPO in Berlin > was misfounded. It's Bylaws appear to preclude such an action: > > The Board shall refer proposals for substantive policies > not received from a Supporting Organization to the Supporting > Organization, if any, with primary responsibility for the area > to which the proposal relates for initial consideration and > recommendation to the Board. > > ICANN Bylaws Section VI (2)(d). > http://www.icann.com/bylaws-09apr99.html#VI But, Bret, this is ICANN, remember, they'll do whatever they want anyway :-)-O el
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- RE: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Mark Henderson-Thynne
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Christopher Ambler
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report Patrick Greenwell
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Repo... Kent Crispin