Re: [IFWP] ICANN's Bylaws and WIPO Report

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, The K*nt wrote:

> > Note that last sentence. Since Article VI-B on the DNSO has been added, 
> > the DNSO exists. 
> 
> There are still vast loopholes, tho.  In particular, the Board could 
> deem that condition 1,2, or 3 were not yet fulfilled, and that 
> additional Bylaw amendments would be necessary...and of course, the 
> phrase "..in the Board's judgement..." leaves the Board a great deal 
> of leeway in deciding such things.  More to the point, this is just 
> legalistic hair splitting.  The Board has significant leeway, 
> regardless. 

But what would a government official (albeit only a backup tape
changer) know about the rule of law anyway?

el