karl auerbach: >When the rate increased, NSI asked, and NSF granted, a
change that would
>increase NSI's profits, but not increase NSI's risk.

You don't have a clue.  I guess the facts just don't matter to you when
it's so much more interesting to make stuff up.

Enough!

Kim

karl your assertion is false.  When the rates increased, NSF had to pay for
every domain name.  it had established a limited budget to do this.  NSF
INITIATED the charging.....NOT NSI....and the agreement warned that
charging might start before it was done.
********************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet          | New handbook just published:IP Insur-
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA| gency & Transformation of Telecomm.See
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)         | http://cookreport.com/insurgency.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                  | Index to 7 years of COOK Report, how to
subscribe, exec summaries, special reports, gloss at http://www.cookreport.com
********************************************************************



Reply via email to