Re: [IFWP] gTLD constituency

[Michael Sondow]

Onno Hovers a écrit:
> 
> So consensus was a requirement for the non-commercial constituency
> but not for the gTLD constituency. The ICANN board is not very
> consequent.

The ICANN Board uses consensus as a weapon to manipulate things the
way the want. When the groups they want to have power have a
majority, they demand voting. When they don't, they say there is no
consensus. They do the same thing with other supposedly democratic
principles. Everything is applied partially, for the benefit of
those groups and organizations - primarily ISOC, CORE, and the
trademark interests - that the ICANN Board was put there by and for.