John and all,
You sure could John. ANd that is the problem, in a nutshell with
the "Constituency Model" of the DNSO/ICANN.... It is divisive
any way you look at it....
John B. Reynolds wrote:
> Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> >
> > >And if ICANN doesnt't like a constituency's membership criteria, it can
> > >refuse to recognize it. Somehow, I don't think ICANN will consider "Joop
> > >Teernstra can expel members at will" an acceptable criterion.
> >
> > Sure, ICANN can not recognize a constituency that follwed the ICANN
> > bylaws. That makes sesne.
> >
>
> The bylaw excerpt you quoted explicitly grants the ICANN Board the authority
> to determine whether or not to recognize constituencies. It is reasonable
> to assume that the appropriateness of would-be constituencies' membership
> criteria will be a major factor in its decisions. Otherwise, I could
> organize a "John Reynolds constituency", claim that I followed the Bylaws in
> doing so, and demand recognition.
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
