At 09:30 PM 6/20/99 -0400, you wrote:
>out of curosity...
>what do we call the $$$ we pay to the registry for domain name renewals
Um, a "domain name registration renewal fee?"
Bill Lovell
>
>ken stubbs
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Gene Marsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, June 20, 1999 10:16 PM
>Subject: RE: [IFWP] S. 705
>
>
>Not me Bill...
>
>I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
>
>Gene...
>+++++
>Hi Bill Lovell, you wrote on 6/20/99 8:06:18 PM:
>
>>At 08:52 PM 6/20/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>Hmmm....
>>
>>And since we are already taxed for phone/telecomm usage, and corporations
>>are likely to be taxed for Internet usage (and are certainly taxed for
>>telecomm), is this not a frivolous tax?
>>
>>I am only playing devil's advocate here. This is a toughy. Any
>>reasonable
>>person could easily stand on either side of the line and view things in a
>>different light.
>>
>>I am still looking for a compelling reason for the tax/fee. ICANN
>>operational costs are not good enough alone.
>>
>>Keep up the banter...
>>
>>Hey, Gene. Worthy discussion here. After all, I was wrong once
>>-- I believe it was back in '06 -- and who knows, it could happen.
>>:-)
>>
>>Bill Lovell
>>
>
>
>
>+++++++++++++++++++++
>I'm very happy @.HOME
>Gene Marsh
>president, anycastNET Incorporated
>
