That was a good one Jeff, made me laugh. About the only thing your
posts are good for.
On Sat, 03 Jul 1999 17:49:09 +0100, Jeff Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>William and all,
>
> You have the potential for the necessary wisdom, but neither the
>will or the where with all to exercise that potential. Some day you might.
>But it won't be today, and judging from your continued activities of
>making false aspersions on Michael, Gordon, Dr. Lisse, myself and
>others it is not likely you will in the near future either.. And that is a
>terrible shame... :(
>
>William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 03 Jul 1999 17:39:05 +0100, Jeff Williams
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >All,
>> >
>> > Gordon and William, It is obvious to most that YOUR reputation WIlliam,
>> >is certainly in question. I would say that this post in response to Gordon
>> >falls into the category of People in glass houses shouldn't throw
>> >stones....
>> >
>> > A word to the wise should be sufficient... However in WIlliam's
>> >particular case, wisdom is something that he has not acquired yet...
>>
>> Actually Jeff, you bring up a good point. Unlike Mr Sondow, I'd never
>> presume to seek or desire to be a spokesman or pointman for this
>> effort. I do not believe that I am the best person for that job
>> either.
>>
>> But my lack of eminent qualification for that position does not take
>> away anything from the fact that neither is Mr Sondow.
>>
>> What I find so amusing is that someone suck as yourself, who is such a
>> well known farse, fraud and phoney ( see http://inegroup.net/ ) would
>> talk about glass houses.....
>>
>> >William X. Walsh wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 19:52:10 -0400, Gordon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Michael Sondow and Jim Dixon, i respect both your opinions. I don't think
>> >> >there is any guarantee at this point that any of us who are desirous
>> >> >bringing ICANN to heel is 100% right in our assertions. The problem for
>> >> >sure is ICANN not which of you is precisely right..... please count to
>> >> >ten...
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Just because Mr Sondow opposes ICANN doesn't mean that the rest of
>> >> those who also do should accept him as their point man Gordon. Most
>> >> of us realize that he is the worst possible person for such a role,
>> >> who has absolutely zero credibility and no chance of being taken
>> >> seriously or succeeding in any fashion.
>> >>
>> >> And he only has himself to blame.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> William X. Walsh
>> >> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>> >> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
>> >>
>> >> "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
>> >> characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
>> >> --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
>> >
>> >Regards,
>>
>> --
>> William X. Walsh
>> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
>>
>> "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
>> characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
>> --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
>
>Regards,
--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934
"The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear."
--Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
