On Wed, 7 Jul 1999 16:50:11 -0700, Kent Crispin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Likewise, the idea that domain names represent a significant venue >for "protected speech" is ridiculous. "microsoftsucks.com" -- it The courts disagree with you. -- William X. Walsh General Manager, DSo Internet Services Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax:(209) 671-7934 "The fact is that domain names are new and have unique characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear." --Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Tradema... sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Tra... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owner... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark O... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Anti-cybersquatting (Trademark Owners) P... Richard J. Sexton