Richard and all,

Richard J. Sexton wrote:

At 12:04 AM 7/9/99 -0400, Jon Zittrain wrote:
><shrug>  I just meant to list the sorts of pressures that have moved DNS
>issues squarely out of the realm of the technical.  I understand that some
>entrepreneurs want *un*shared registries--they could make lots of money as
>the sole holders of them--while others want a piece of a registry: witness
>the number of companies seeking to join the shared registration system for
>.com, .net, and .org.  And, the White Paper--which I think I've seen you
>call a consensus document at times--does reference the idea.  I
>dunno.  Doesn't seem like bias to me to simply include it on the list, but
>I suppose he who has the blinders on doesn't readily know what he's
>missing.  ...JZ

Uh, I don't think the guy doing .FREE was planning
on being "an entrapeneur wanting to make a lot
of money". Some people probably do, while others
hum the cost recovery mantra.

Shared/non-shared, registry/registrar vs. peered registry,
non-profit/for-profit/low-profit...
it's a big mix and there's a lot of permutations
and combinations. Again, all the world's not
.com and there are too many applications of the
DNS to be covered under a single homogensous model,
no matter how well it may or may not work for .com.


  Very true Richard, and it is my belief that most folks following
these discussions for even a short time realize it as well.  Well
hell, even old Vinton Cref (Wooops for got to copy him on this post)
seems to be fond of .MARS for instance.  And why not.  It really is
mostly a matter of getting to the point of HOW we implement or want
to see new gTLD's made available so that we can have a multiple
solar system DNS universe (No pun intended there Vinton, old boy).
We do have a multiple country an government world don't we
after all?  Why not than, multiple registries, Root's and Root structures
that are interconnected?  Doesn't this just provide for more and
potentially better opportunities?
"The Internet is for everyone", but one size doesn't fit all....

 

--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"They were of a mind to govern us and we were of a mind to govern ourselves."

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman INEGroup (Over 95k members strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.

E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number:  972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
 

Reply via email to