Tony, You wrote: > > Especially considering Roberto was at the last testbed > advisory committee meeting and I don't recall that either > he or anyone else made such an assertion... :-) > I was only at the "first" testbed meeting in Reston, when the testbed programme was described to us by NSI. Off my memory it was in March (it was cherry blossom in DC). Not having brought my cristal ball at that meeting, I was unable to predict that problems would have arosen later on. Please excuse me ;>). Regards Roberto P.S.: Was "that" meeting also the last one? I assume not. Maybe you have mistaken me for somebody else.
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's b... A.M. Rutkowski
- [IFWP] RE: The scope of NDAs Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN... Werner Staub
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws Ivan Pope
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's b... A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws cgomes