Tony wrote: > What's been bothersome is how the NDA - which > was meant to protect all testbed participants > against snipping public remarks - has been used against > NSI, with constant innuendos that all > problems arose only from NSI, and that > somehow NSI wasn't responsive, when this plainly > was not the case. Oh, come ON. NSI imposed an NDA on what was supposed to be a public learning process. It doesn't take much to work out that it was imposed to ensure that it is as hard as possible for newcomers to compete. An NDA that doesn't even allow participants to discuss the level of problems is a travesty. Oh, and does that mean poor old NSI is accused of being the source of all problems. My heart weeps. Ivan
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's b... A.M. Rutkowski
- [IFWP] RE: The scope of NDAs Jon Zittrain
- Re: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN... Werner Staub
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws Ivan Pope
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's b... A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws cgomes
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] The rough consensus in Berlin and ICANN's bylaws cgomes