Re: Re[2]: [IFWP] Re: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN Santiago real video feed (fwd)

[Planet Communications Computing Facility]

The existence or non existence of a provision and it's application is
not relevant here.  What is at issue is the right to incorporate privacy
law into icann at an oportune time - NOW.

On Mon, 23 Aug 1999, William X. Walsh wrote:

> Monday, August 23, 1999, 4:35:49 AM, Planet Communications Computing Facility 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > If ICANN wants to play - it needs the same privacy controls as exsist in
> > the us government.
> 
> As was already pointed out numerous times, there is amble evidence
> that no applicable provisions exist, and that there is great
> precedence even at the US Government level for collecting information
> on participants.
> 
> Repeating this over and over again is getting rather boring.
> 
> --
> William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax:(209) 671-7934
> Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
> 
> (IDNO MEMBER)
> Support the Cyberspace Association, the 
> constituency of Individual Domain Name Owners 
> http://www.idno.org
> 
>