Tony Rutkowski pointed out: Hi Roberto, The way I understand it, there is no obligation from ICANN to consult the governments (in particular those who choose not to participate in the GAC). au contraire (sorry I don't know the Italian). The Board will notify the chairman of the Governmental Advisory Committee of any proposal for which it seeks comments under Article III, Section 3(b) and will consider any response to that notification prior to taking action. See Art. VII, Sec. 3.a, ICANN Bylaws. Art. III, Sec. 3(b) includes just about everything of a substantive nature. You are right, I stand corrected :<( . Nevertheless, I keep the part of my point about ICANN not having any obligation to contact individual governments that do not participate in the GAC. Regards Roberto
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship A.M. Rutkowski
- [Attention Becky Burr, William Dailey, and The Hous... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship R . Gaetano
- Re: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Mark R Measday
- Re: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship Michael Sondow
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship R . Gaetano
- RE: [IFWP] Latest on the Australian censorship A.M. Rutkowski