Gordon,
Resign from what? From his position at NSI, maybe?
I thought that as CEO he is accountable to his shareholders, not to the
Internet Community (not even to speak about the IFWP list).
Regards
Roberto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gordon Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 September 1999 9:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [IFWP] Jim Rutt Should Resign
>
>
> Rutt in his Rutt report said he cared about the internet. That one
> of his highest priorities was to preserve the freedom and
> independence of the Internet.
>
> Today I heard from a source with primary knowledge that Pincus wasn't
> lying.....that NSI rather than fight ICANN will enable it by signing
> a much modified version of the registrar's accreditation agreements.
>
> If Rutt is an honorable man who meant what he said, he clearly hasn't
> delivered. Resigning is the best way to preserve his honor.
>
> If the Rutt Report was was purposeful deception, then we will watch
> him stay on and slip ICANN's regulatory nose around all our necks.
>
> Maybe you believe ICANN will make real consessions in a modified
> agreement? i don't.
> ****************************************************************
> The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years
> of the COOK Report
> 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
> (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) ICANN: The Internet's
> Oversight Board -
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW - Incompetence or
> Duplicity? ICANN
> and it Allies' Stealth Agenda http://cookreport.com/isoccontrol.shtml
> ****************************************************************
>
