On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Mikael Pawlo wrote:
> Den 10 Nov 1999 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> (---)
> > Shame on you and anyone support these actions.
> (---)
>
> I never said I supported the alleged censorship. However, your postings
as Elizabeth can't be defended in any way and are as such enough to get
you banned from these lists in my humble opinion. Then again, you might
have had a hard time during the censorship, beeing to angry to think
clearly, which might be enough to keep you on the list.
Oh yes it can. The fight against censorship can employ any tactic needed.
As for being angry - I assure you I am not. In fact someone from the US
called me and I think they were surprised I was rather entertained by the
whole shebang.
Remember - the censorship on the ga gives me amunition. It's not a bad
thing.
> But I'm not the one to say more about this - at this time. However, it
sure would be nice to hear something from the list crew.
There will be nothing from them .. a lame excuse - maybe - another lie.
Little Ben Edeleman has learned how to lie from this group. Only 19 and
already learning deception as a model.
We'll get something irrelevant. In fact I'm sure committee meeting are in
progress on how to deal with this.
And to think - I was just experimenting. This was to be a surprise for
elizabeth on xmas.
Oh well ... bacl to the drawing board.
regards
joe
