On 2012-04-04 09:19, Michael Schuh wrote:
Am 4. April 2012 14:47 schrieb Ugo Bellavance <u...@lubik.ca <mailto:u...@lubik.ca>>: Hi, Setting up pfsense on a physical server with 2 onboard NICs. The available bandwidth is more than enough (gigabit interfaces for a 10mbps WAN and 100mbps LAN). I think I should do an LAGG interface, then put VLAN interfaces on it, but is the added redundancy worth the hassle? Thanks, Ugo _________________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org <mailto:List@lists.pfsense.org> http://lists.pfsense.org/__mailman/listinfo/list <http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list> Hi Ugo, to reach which target?
For all the interfaces
There is some lack of Information to give you any advice. a Firewall with 2 physical interfaces has only wan and lan, so no lagg needed?
Hmm, theoretically, I think my idea may work, but I think in practice it is not possible to configure an lagg interface without having at least one (temporary) nic available during the configuration.
_______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
