Every data I've seen on "them sucking" has to do specifically with NTFS,
which the newly released firmware update is supposed to fix.
We are using 840Evo's in all of our storage arrays, and haven't seen any
issues(EXT4/ZFS).
Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
On 10/30/2014 07:33 AM, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Oct 30, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Jeppe Øland <jol...@gmail.com
<mailto:jol...@gmail.com>> wrote:
3 year old Kingston SSDs are not like new Kingston SSDs.
Agreed.
On the other hand, I tend to distrust manufacturers that shipped
completely unreliable drives without any thought.
Kingston/OCZ/Crucial are all in this boat for me.
I’m sure I’ve been burned at least as badly by these, and others, and
I still buy from them.
Samsung 840s are the darling of the “cheap, fast SSD” and they turn
out to suck, too:
http://www.pcper.com/news/Storage/Samsung-Germany-acknowledges-840-Basic-performance-slow-down-promises-fix
As for Nano, I thought it mounted almost everything as RO and only
changed settings to write down settings changes, and RRD databases etc
on reboots?
I think I’ve already responded to this.
nano is a > 10 year old “solution” to the problems that existed at the
time.
http://markmail.org/message/rxe4xfpmdwva7q3e
That doesn’t mean it’s a bad solution, but though it’s author is a
brilliant individual, he obviously didn’t envision SSD in 2004.
Jim
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
