9. mars 2015 11:52 skrev "Brian Candler" <b.cand...@pobox.com>: > > On 09/03/2015 10:47, Espen Johansen wrote: >> >> >> Actually you cant use proxy arp as it has a limit affecting you. Proxyarp IPs cant be in same subnet. Sorry. >> > Are you sure? I have a pfsense box where it's working.
For 2.2 I'm not sure but it used to be a limit afaik. > > >> >> What you really want is a alias ip on the interface and pfsense does not support this even if the underlying freebsd does this. >> > Are you sure? I have another pfsense box where that's working too. Check ifconfig em0 or whatever your wan if is. From diag or ssh shell and see if the interface has all the alias IPs. I'm pretty sure yes. The whole reason for adding proxyarp was that normal alias was hard to implement. Iirc one reason was that any change to a alias would take down the wan interface and all aliases during config commit. > > >> There was (is?) reasons for this but las time I tried to implement that was in 2006/2007 >> > You don't think there's any possibility pfSense has changed or improved since then? I havent read up on ifconfig in that regard for a long time so maybe. I'm not a active dev anymore so that is for Chris B or Ermal or others to answer. > > > _______________________________________________ > pfSense mailing list > https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list > Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
_______________________________________________ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
