> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 7:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re: > my priorities are a little different. No problem. > 1. With the exception of a few minor glitches (and some very > rare crashes) REBOL/Core is currently doing most of what I would like > to see it do. It would be helpful if you posted a more detailed list > of items that you think are missing. Well, here are some: - external program execution - database connection - possible binary script format for distribution (see encryption thread) - better error handling (error messages) - interactive debugger (I know this will need some kind of GUI ;-)) - way to combine Rebol/Core with a script as one exe - better documentation - native dialect support, or how it should look like Robert
- [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re: ddalley
- [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re: icimjs
- [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2) Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(3) icimjs
- [REBOL] Wishlist (was Openletter to Rebol HQ... jbone
- [REBOL] Wishlist (was Openletter to Rebo... icimjs
- [REBOL] Wishlist (was Openletter to... jbone
- [REBOL] Wishlist (was Openletter to... robert . muench
- [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(4) Petr . Krenzelok
- [REBOL] Openletter to Rebol HQ. Re:(2) randyk
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? robert . muench
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? icimjs
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re: robert . muench
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(2) icimjs
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(3) news . ted
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? Re:(4... jimg
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? ... news . ted
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? ... jimg
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? ... robert . muench
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? ... jimg
- [REBOL] REBOL/View vs. OpenAmulet? ... robert . muench