Mihael Zadravec wrote: > > logo is just logo, and has relevance only for sighted users.
I have been away from this list for a while now... When did it stop being a web standards forum and become instead a web opinion forum? Mihael, what supporting evidence do you have for this claim? While a company's logo or word mark may *primarily* be for visual representation of the company, I would also venture that if I spoke of "the swoosh" logo, or "the golden arches" even many non-sighted people would know I was referring to Nike and the MacDonald's hamburger chain. You need to be *very* careful when stating things that you specify if they are "fact" or "opinion", as I take great exception to your factual stating of an opinion here... Sorry too if I come off "grouchy", but this is important! JF ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
