Well besides a basic ewww.. It says “The batteries should allow the bike to run six hours at 80 mph." Statements like that lead people to some real disapointment if not true. ANd if it were where the heck do I get me some!
--- Eric Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not at all impressed. > > Also, this bike, and the CHP electric chopper > (http://www.bikernet.com/bikebarn/PageViewer.asp?PageID=583) > seem to > have a need for a fake motor, or at least cylinder > heads. Why is that? > The CHP article even calls it an "Electric V-Twin," > which is ridiculous, > as the V-Twin refers to the piston engine layout. > Do they really think > people are so stupid that they'll either: A) Think > that it's some kind > of electric piston, or B) won't consider it a real > bike without cylinder > heads, despite _knowing_ it's electric? Of course, > then there's the gas > tank ... > > Of course, noone ever accused the custom chopper > guys of having > substance over style. > > > > Mike wrote: > >> > http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle001.jpg > > >> > >> > http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle002.jpg > > >> > >> > http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle003.jpg > > >> > >> > http://www.bikemenu.com/builder/Arlen_Ness/Arlen_Ness_Electric_Motorcycle004.jpg > > >> > > > > I'm not terribly impressed with the looks of that. > Any one else? It > > looks to me like they tossed some batteries in the > frame then wrapped > > them with a bread box. Ness usually comes up with > better looking stuff > > than that. > > > > >
