Is the only reason we need these methods so that we can use lldb-test? If so, perhaps the tests can be written in terms of lldb itself, similar to the existing NativePDB tests On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:39 AM Aleksandr Urakov via Phabricator < revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> aleksandr.urakov added a comment. > > I can do it, but unfortunately not this week... I want to join the native > plugin development some later, at the end of this month, after some current > work. > > > Repository: > rLLDB LLDB > > CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION > https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122/new/ > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122 > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
