labath added a comment. In D55122#1318295 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122#1318295>, @leonid.mashinskiy wrote:
> > Is this true? Is it not possible for a program to depend on a value of a > > register which will be defined later? > > I am not totally sure about this, but all valid fpo programs that I've seen > in existing pdb support this invariant. > So I think that we can assume that every assignment depends only to > precedent statements. Ok, that's fine with me, I just wanted to check that was intentional. It might be worth mentioning that in a comment somewhere. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
