aprantl added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/DumpRegisterValue.cpp:136-137
+  // See if we have made this type before and can reuse it.
+  CompilerType fields_type = ast->GetTypeForIdentifier<clang::CXXRecordDecl>(
+      ConstString(register_type_name.c_str()));
+
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
> aprantl wrote:
> > bulbazord wrote:
> > > This seems highly specific to C++... Let's try to find another way to do 
> > > this, ideally with `TypeSystem` instead of `TypeSystemClang` and 
> > > `clang::CXXRecordDecl`.
> > Are we saving a lot of code by going through the clang typesystem here, or 
> > would walking the bits and formatting the directly be roughly the same 
> > amount of code?
> Funny you should mention that.
> 
> I was initially doing that, but in the RFC it was suggested I use the 
> existing printers for C types 
> (https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-showing-register-fields-in-lldb/64676/2). 
> There's also a hint that this would make assigning to specific fields more 
> easy (though that is a very far off goal).
> 
> This is what the first version looked like:
> ```
> (lldb) register read cpsr
>     cpsr = 0x60001000
> | N | Z | C | V | TCO | DIT | UAO | PAN | SS | IL | SSBS | BTYPE | D | A | I 
> | F | nRW | EL | SP |
> | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |  0  |  0  |  0  |  0  | 0  | 0  |  1   |   0   | 0 | 0 | 0 
> | 0 |  0  | 0  | 0  |
> ```
> Of course it would be refined based on line length and field size etc etc. A 
> lot of the things the type printers already do, which is why using them 
> looked like it would save some effort.
> 
> Some of that extra formatting code will get written anyway because I want to 
> eventually add a register command that will show you the register layout. So 
> table formatting is needed either way. That would produce something like:
> ```
> (lldb) register info cpsr
> | 31 | 30 | ...
> | N  |  Z | ...
> ```
> 
> So overall no there's nothing preventing me from walking the bits. Assuming 
> you already have code to format text tables nicely, it would be about the 
> same amount of code.
> 
> I need to check if we have any generic table formatting code, or could 
> extract some from somewhere.
Sorry I wasn't aware of the history :-)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D145580/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D145580

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to