On 25 July 2014 22:58, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/26/2014 12:49 AM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
>> From my research I began to suspect that LMMS has to have the same licence >> as the LADSPA plugins we ship with. > No we don't. The LADSPA plugins are separate programs and not a part of > LMMS. They can, and are, licensed under their own licenses and their > licensing does not affect the license of LMMS. Yep. Mere aggregation, like Linux distros. (Note that copyright is complicated as is, and the GPL is a sort of judo trick on copyright as it stands. It's a very robust one, but it takes a complicated thing and inverts it. So ask your local FSF or Wikipedia copyright obsessive for clarification!) - d. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
