I forgot to add in my last email. if we focus on a new core. I think we
should extend how long 1.1 is going to be supported for as well as how
often we are going to release bug fix releases for it.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Jonathan Aquilina <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I think the best way forward work on getting the new core integrated all
> these features and issues in terms of crashes etc that we run into could
> potentially be mitigated with an RT safe core.
>
> As well what I want to spear head and start working on are unit tests as
> well as functional and integration testing besides travis.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Vesa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 07/29/2014 04:07 PM, musikbear wrote:
>> > Perhaps a 2.0 on an other core is not a 2 y prospect, but a 5+ ..?
>> > imo we should improve and expand /what we got/.
>>
>> No offense musikbear, but what you're saying is analoguous to: "oh, I
>> know our house is slanted and the foundations are crumbling, but maybe
>> we can still keep building the second floor"...
>>
>> What we got will only take us so far, eventually we WILL hit a wall
>> where it's no longer possible to get by with "what we got". We can
>> probably make do and keep patching things up the best we can, but for
>> the long run, we're going to need to fix the foundations. Here, I'm
>> looking for ideas for how we can achieve that.
>>
>> > But all work on current
>> > core, should have a pin stuck in it. A pin marked /'re-usable' as
>> module/.
>> > Vesa, you are the one who can say if such /modulation/ at all is
>> possible?
>> > If it is, then a 2.0lmms would not be a 'scratch' project, and further
>> > devellopment on 1.x, would also be a little'working for the future'
>> > Does that sounds like garbadge?
>>
>> I'm not really sure what you're suggesting here... we can try to develop
>> and improve the current engine, but I'm not sure if it's possible to
>> improve it sufficiently. Some argue, it isn't. I don't know, it could
>> turn out that fixing the current engine would be even more work than
>> just replacing it with a better one.
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Infragistics Professional
>> Build stunning WinForms apps today!
>> Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
>> Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> LMMS-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Aquilina
>
--
Jonathan Aquilina
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
