On 07/29/2014 04:51 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> He did reply with some useful information, but for the most part it
> was a no-go due to the mentoring time required to get a new developer
> involved.
>
> Two years later we are probably in a better situation as it appears
> we have more people active with the codebase making the mentoring
> process more possible.
I think if we can get a paid developer, part of the project would be
orientation, where all of us could pitch in to help the developer get
acquintated with the codebase. This isn't the biggest hurdle here IMO.
>
> Here was my wish list in 2012:
>
> I understand nearly none of this addresses a brand new core but this
> was before I got actively involved on the developer team. If I were
> to recreate this list now, it would be a bit different.
Yes. Most of the things on your wishlist are things that we can probably
implement just fine on our own. The core engine is the problematic part.
IMO if we do get a paid developer, we should focus their efforts on the
hard parts, otherwise it would just be wasteful.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls.
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
