On 01/28/2015 04:25 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Not sure how I feel about this... > > Perhaps instead of a feature freeze just yet you and Dave can request > a bump to the next milestone for items that you fee are out of scope > given our resources. > > The reason I say this is because rather than a rock rolling back to > its place (Sisyphus), we're more of a snowball gaining size and > momentum. I'll let Vesa, Lukas and Dave chime in here too because > proper milestone management was more of a nice-to-have and less of a > line-in-the-sand previously, but I'm in favor of organized progress as > well. :)
Organization? In the LMMS community?? BLASPHEMY. Seriously though, if someone wants to clean up & organize tags, that's fine. Remember though that a feature freeze doesn't concern bugs, only features. So bugs that are tagged as 1.2 can still stay 1.2. Also the next tag after 1.2 should probably be 2.0. As for the freeze, I think we talked of February before? Maybe a week or two from now? Is anyone working on any big features right now? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
