On 28 January 2015 at 23:44, Amadeus Folego <[email protected]> wrote:
> If there are compelling reasons they'll move. > Wouldn't you prefer starting a project on LMMS 2.0 if it has LV2 > support? No crashes? A lot of usability improvements? Improved midi > capabilities? Export individual FX Channels? Etc... If you break users' stuff, they will leave and not come back. And they will be entirely correct to do so, else it would be encouraging you do it again with 3.0. When 2.0 comes out, the *first* thing users will do is try their 1.2 files in it. If you break users' work, they will never forgive you, and it's ridiculous for you to expect otherwise. Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > But we have every intention of making 1.x projects playable. For those that > upgraded from 0.4.x to 1.0.x you probably noticed quite a few places where > the old project didn't play correctly. This stuff is going to happen from > version to version and we take the good with the bad. It is part of progress. I assume there will be a round of testing of back-compatibility breakages. Has Vesa actually walked back his original statement that we should throw away all our old work and write new stuff, or is this just you saying this? - d. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
