The agreed to format for git send-email is --subject-prefix="API-NEXT
PATCH"  (or PATCHv2, etc.)

On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think there might be some ambiguity here: I understand that the correct
> format of subject line is [PATCH API-NEXT], rather than lower case, I'll do
> my best not to forget that next time. But do you expect me to resend the
> patch with a different subject line? I assume however picks this up
> (Maxim?) is already aware of this minor mistake and picks it up anyway, but
> I might be wrong.
> Or, do you wait for me to send it again with an another patch implementing
> this behaviour across our codebase? I thought I should send it once it gets
> commited to api-next.
> And finally, should the subject line of this next patch start with [PATCH
> API-NEXT] as well?
>
> Regards,
>
> Zoli
>
> On 28/05/15 15:28, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>
>> We agreed that *any* change to the include/odp directory would be
>> flagged API-NEXT (avoids having to make decisions).  We can then decide
>> which to cherry-pick into the mainline on an expedited basis for simple
>> things like documentation only changes, but these would be reviewed on a
>> case-by-case basis.
>>
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org
>> <mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org>> wrote:
>>
>>     Yes, I missed that prefix. Do you want me to resend the patch?
>>     I'll send an another patch to implement this behaviour in the repo
>>     wherever odp_pktio_send is called. But I think we can't create a
>>     unit test for it, can we?
>>
>>     On 28/05/15 14:56, Bill Fischofer wrote:
>>
>>         This needs to be API-NEXT as it is a change to an API file.
>>
>>         On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Savolainen, Petri (Nokia -
>>         FI/Espoo)
>>         <petri.savolai...@nokia.com <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>
>>         <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com
>>         <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>              Reviewed-by: Petri Savolainen <petri.savolai...@nokia.com
>>         <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>
>>              <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com
>>         <mailto:petri.savolai...@nokia.com>>>
>>
>>
>>               > -----Original Message-----
>>               > From: lng-odp [mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org
>>         <mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org>
>>              <mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org
>>         <mailto:lng-odp-boun...@lists.linaro.org>>] On Behalf Of ext
>>               > Zoltan Kiss
>>               > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 3:19 PM
>>               > To: lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>>         <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
>>         <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>> >>
>>               > Subject: [lng-odp] [PATCH] api-next: packet_io: clarify
>> what
>>              happens when
>>               > not all packets are sent
>>               >
>>               > Currently our examples are not handling this situation
>>         as well.
>>               >
>>               > Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.k...@linaro.org
>>         <mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org>
>>              <mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org
>>
>>         <mailto:zoltan.k...@linaro.org>>>
>>
>>               > ---
>>               >  include/odp/api/packet_io.h | 4 +++-
>>               >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>               >
>>               > diff --git a/include/odp/api/packet_io.h
>>              b/include/odp/api/packet_io.h
>>               > index 89356a6..b97b2b8 100644
>>               > --- a/include/odp/api/packet_io.h
>>               > +++ b/include/odp/api/packet_io.h
>>               > @@ -111,7 +111,9 @@ int odp_pktio_recv(odp_pktio_t pktio,
>>              odp_packet_t
>>               > pkt_table[], int len);
>>               >   * @param pkt_table[]  Array of packets to send
>>               >   * @param len          length of pkt_table[]
>>               >   *
>>               > - * @return Number of packets sent
>>               > + * @return Number of packets sent. If it is less than
>>         'len', the
>>               > remaining
>>               > + * packets at the end of pkt_table[] are left intact,
>>         and caller
>>              has to
>>               > take
>>               > + * care of them.
>>               >   * @retval <0 on failure
>>               >   */
>>               >  int odp_pktio_send(odp_pktio_t pktio, odp_packet_t
>>         pkt_table[],
>>              int len);
>>               > --
>>               > 1.9.1
>>               >
>>               > _______________________________________________
>>               > lng-odp mailing list
>>               > lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>>         <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
>>         <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>> >>
>>               > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>              _______________________________________________
>>              lng-odp mailing list
>>         lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org>
>>         <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org <mailto:lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
>> >>
>>         https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp
>>
>>
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
lng-odp mailing list
lng-odp@lists.linaro.org
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/lng-odp

Reply via email to