Well I don't think it has ever explicitly been discussed, but obviously something similar could be done for thematic/topical chapters (HOT being the only one that would be on the table for now) and that is why the draft contains language that makes it clear that such non-local chapters will be allowed to operate even where a local chapter exists. The only issue I see there is offering exclusivity for specific topics and maybe we should simply not provide that.
Simon Am 17.10.2013 09:07, schrieb Kate Chapman: > Hi Simon, > > Is there thought about this being utilized with thematic chapters as > well? For example HOT? > > Also HOT currently has openstreetmap.or.id registered, but there is > not a local OSM Indonesia chapter. > > Thanks, > > -Kate > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Simon Poole <si...@osmfoundation.org> wrote: >> As agreed at the last LCWG meeting, I've reworked the draft agreement to >> contain most of the changes I proposed, see >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/Agreement >> >> Please review, comment and discuss. The document should not be >> considered the final legal text and insofar you should focus more on the >> general contents and not on specific wording, it will go through a >> formal legal review before being finalized. >> >> Simon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Local-chapters mailing list >> Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters _______________________________________________ Local-chapters mailing list Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters
