Some comments: (4.2) This seems to imply that the local chapter can use the "OpenStreetMap Foundation", "OSM Foundation" and "OSMF" trademarks. I think this can be limited to "OpenStreeMap", "OSM", and maybe even "State of the Map" and "SotM".
(12) "to be conducted in person before a certified mediator agreed by the parties". This seems expensive since an in-person mediation is required. Who will pay for such mediation? Unlike in an actual suit where the judge/jury may award legal fees to one party, there seems to be no cost provision for mediation. Otherwise, the document is quite good. Eugene (OSMPH) On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Simon Poole <si...@osmfoundation.org>wrote: > As agreed at the last LCWG meeting, I've reworked the draft agreement to > contain most of the changes I proposed, see > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/Agreement > > Please review, comment and discuss. The document should not be > considered the final legal text and insofar you should focus more on the > general contents and not on specific wording, it will go through a > formal legal review before being finalized. > > Simon > > _______________________________________________ > Local-chapters mailing list > Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters >
_______________________________________________ Local-chapters mailing list Local-chapters@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/local-chapters
