Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
Ralph Goers skrev den 03-08-2008 06:22:
A number of issues have comments here that they won't be fixed in
1.2. Rather than just marking them to WONTFIX or closed wouldn't it
be more appropriate to create a corresponding issue in Jira (where
appropriate) for log4j2 so it can be considered?
Please note that I am suggesting WONTFIX instead of just setting the
status, to start a discussion of what should be done as issues should
not be in the NEW state forever. If there is concensus that this will
not be fixed in log4j 1.2 the issue will not as such go away and can
be reopened later. Enhancement requests can also be added to
http://wiki.apache.org/logging-log4j/Log4jRequestedFeatures
Also log4j 1.2 version should be kept stable - it should be possible
to replace any 1.2.x jar directly with a 1.2.y jar (where y>x) with
identical behaviour. This puts rather strong restrictions on what can
be changed.
I don't think you got the point I was trying to make. I fully agree that
some bugs can't be fixed in 1.2.x. I fully agree that they should be
resolved in bugzilla. But as they are moved to WONTFIX here a
corresponding issue should be opened in Jira for log4j2 so that it can
be determined if it is appropriate to be fixed in that version. I really
don't want to have to scour bugzilla to find all these cases if I don't
have to.
Ralph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
