Hah, that's funny, because that chaos is exactly why I DO think there should be a veto power. :-P
Nick On May 8, 2013, at 8:02 PM, Remko Popma wrote: > I should clarify that this TED talk is the reason I don't like the idea of a > veto. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2013/05/09, at 10:00, Remko Popma <rem...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> One of the reddit founders did an interesting (and short) TED talk on this. >> Search for "ted talk reddit mister splashy pants". >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2013/05/09, at 9:11, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote: >> >>> Agreed. Collect votes from as many sources as possible. I DO think the PMC >>> and/or key devs should be able to veto, however ... just in case. >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> On May 8, 2013, at 6:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>>> We can mail to the dev and user list (and pmc too), and use social media. >>>> We can also update the log4j 2 beta web site with the announcement. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On May 8, 2013, at 19:34, Remko Popma <rem...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Christian, >>>>> >>>>> That is a great idea! >>>>> Not just to get a nice new logo, but also (more important imho) to >>>>> attract attention to the new 2.0 version. Marketing yay! >>>>> >>>>> How do you want to do this? >>>>> Do we pick from the submissions, or do we have a second round where >>>>> people vote for their favorite? >>>>> >>>>> I would like the second one. Not that I don't have great taste (haha - >>>>> that's my wife laughing, I was serious), but it is a chance to get even >>>>> more people involved and thus attract even more attention. >>>>> >>>>> -Remko >>>>> >>>>> From: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >>>>> To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org> >>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 9, 2013 6:10 AM >>>>> Subject: Re: Logo contest? >>>>> >>>>> For some reason I picture two guys with their arms outstretched standing >>>>> on a spinning log in a body of water.... ;-) >>>>> >>>>> Hopefully, most of you will understand that. Probably not - In the >>>>> northwest U.S. they have lumberjack contests where the guy who can stay >>>>> on the log longest wins. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On May 8, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > I am sorry to say that I never liked the log4j logo. I always found it >>>>> > 100% ugly. >>>>> > Recently somebody else said, he doesn't know what a green cup has to >>>>> > do with logging. I agree with him. >>>>> > >>>>> > Now the log4j 1.x logo is a green cup. No doubt about it. >>>>> > >>>>> > But log4j 2.x is different. In my opinion we should get the word out >>>>> > and have some kind of logo contest. I am willing to assist and lead, >>>>> > once the current discussion on other places calm down. >>>>> > >>>>> > My hope is, we would release the first stable version of log4j 2.x >>>>> > with a new logo. We are a fresh team, we have a new atmosphere and >>>>> > log4j 2.x is somewhat great. I believe we simply need a logo which >>>>> > expresses all that. >>>>> > >>>>> > Any thoughts around this? >>>>> > >>>>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
