Markers all around! No logging levels, just allow markers to have ordinals
or bit-flags to allow more flexible filtering.

Sorry, nothing useful to add beyond wild speculations.


On 18 January 2014 15:15, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:

> Actually, here is how I would prefer it.  Let’s see if it makes sense to
> anyone else.
>
> FATAL - Hopefully, almost never logged because the system is crashing.
> ERROR - Something affecting the usability of the system occurred.
> WARN - Something not nice, but probably recoverable occurred. May lead to
> errors later.
> INFO - Something of general interest, but not necessarily significant.
> DIAG or DIAGNOSTIC - Events that can be used by operations or users to
> diagnose problems in the system.
> DEBUG - Used by developers for internal debugging.
> VERBOSE - Used to log minute details of the system.  As its dictionary
> definition implies this is extremely chatty.
> TRACE - Adds tracing of method entry and exit, possibly object creation
> and initialization.
>
> I believe these should be enough for anybody.  I still think CONFIG is a
> Marker at the INFO level. The advantage of being a Marker is that it can be
> enabled regardless of its level and enabling it doesn’t imply enabling
> other levels.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Ralph Goers 
> <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:
>
>> STEP?  No clue what that means.
>>
>> Gary, if you want to implement VERBOSE between INFO and DEBUG I’m OK with
>> that, but what will that map to in SLF4J, etc.  DEBUG?
>>
>
> Sounds OK, I can see it as debug data, but for users, instead of
> developers.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>> And yes, something on the web site should document our recommended usage
>> for levels and markers.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2014, at 10:53 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, my view of VERBOSE is that it is _more_ information, hence INFO <
>> VERBOSE < DEBUG; while it sounds like Ralphs sees it as more DEBUG data.
>>
>> For me DEBUG data is going to be already verbose, even more than
>> 'verbose'.
>>
>> What is interesting (to me) is that DEBUG is often misused based on this
>> basic mix: debug messages can be for users *and/or* for developers, there
>> is no distinction in the audience.
>>
>> For example, as a user, I want to get data to help me debug my
>> configuration and my process. As a developer, I want to debug the code.
>> These can be two very different set of data.
>>
>> But we do not have DEBUG_USER and DEBUG_DEV levels. I would see INFO next
>> to VERBOSE as useful to users. Then DEBUG and TRACE useful for developers.
>> Each app can have its convention of course, but it would be nice to have
>> the distinction available through levels for developers to use.
>>
>> I see TRACE as method entry and exit type of logging, *very* *low* level
>> stuff.
>>
>> We could also have both (ducking for projectiles):
>>
>> INFO
>> VERBOSE
>> DEBUG
>> STEP
>> TRACE
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Oops. I just noticed you proposed that VERBOSE be between INFO and
>>> DEBUG. Now that I don’t understand. My experience is that VERBOSE is
>>> usually more detailed than debug messages, not less.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I understand the need for CONFIG.  However it isn’t clear to me whether
>>> it belongs between INFO and WARN or DEBUG and INFO.  That is because it
>>> typically would be used to log configuration during startup.  That doesn’t
>>> necessarily imply that you would then want to see all INFO messages as
>>> well.  Due to that, it would make more sense to me to make a CONFIG marker.
>>>
>>> I don’t really understand the point of FINE or FINER.
>>>
>>> On the other hand, VERBOSE does make a bit more sense, but I’m
>>> struggling with how that is any different than TRACE.  I guess the idea is
>>> that TRACE is for control flow (entry, exit) and VERBOSE is for more
>>> detailed debug messages?  I suppose I can go along with that argument, but
>>> again one could just as easily create a VERBOSE marker and attach it to
>>> either TRACE or DEBUG.  I guess I wouldn’t object if VERBOSE was added as a
>>> Level but I’m not really convinced it is necessary either.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 18, 2014, at 7:08 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've always liked Ralph's argument that Markers give users much more
>>> flexibility than any predefined Levels.
>>> I would prefer to stick to the log4j/slf4j level names.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:32 PM, Gary Gregory 
>>> <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Interesting, I have been wanting a VERBOSE level better INFO and DEBUG.
>>>>
>>>> See
>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4j-dev/201310.mbox/%3CCACZkXPxNwYbn__CbXUqFhC7e3Q=kee94j+udhe8+6jiubcz...@mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>>
>>>> You'll have to dig a little in that ref to find my proposal, sorry I'm
>>>> on my phone ATM.
>>>>
>>>> It sounds like we see logging configuration messages differently
>>>> though. I do not like the name CONFIG because it does not sound like a
>>>> level to me. Otoh, many command lines have a verbose AND a debug switch. So
>>>> it makes sense to me too have corresponding levels.
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>> From: Nick Williams
>>>> Date:01/17/2014 23:50 (GMT-05:00)
>>>> To: Log4J Developers List
>>>> Subject: Web Issues, Logging Levels, and GA
>>>>
>>>> Wanted to update y'all. As you know, I've been very absent lately due
>>>> to the book consuming every minute of my free time. I know I haven't been
>>>> contributing my due, and for that please accept my sincerest apologies. The
>>>> book is finally done (goes on sale next month!) and I can get back to
>>>> regular life. I'm going to be out of town for the next week on a
>>>> much-needed vacation with very limited access to email. I'll be back the
>>>> weekend of January 25-26, and that weekend I will be spending almost the
>>>> entire time finally dealing with the 8-10 web application-related bugs.
>>>> After that, I don't see any encumbrances to releasing 
>>>> 2.0.0.GA<http://2.0.0.ga/>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> Except...
>>>>
>>>> Logging Levels. We kinda-sorta talked about this a few months ago, and
>>>> a few months before that, and a few months before that, but we never
>>>> actually DID anything about it. It's clear by now that my "extendable enum"
>>>> proposal (that would be a drop-in replacement for and binary compatible
>>>> with the current Level enum) is not going to be accepted. Absent any other
>>>> proposals, I suggest we add the following new levels before GA:
>>>>
>>>> CONFIG - Between INFO and WARN, mapped to INFO for bridges to other
>>>> frameworks that don't have an equivalent level
>>>>
>>>> FINE - Between DEBUG and TRACE, mapped to TRACE for bridges to other
>>>> frameworks that don't have an equivalent level
>>>>
>>>> I'll let y'all chat about that over the next week. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Be back soon,
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>

Reply via email to