Yeah, plain 'streams' is not great. Let's see... we are talking about java.io classes that are OutputStreams, InputStreams, Writers, and Readers.
- log4j-java.io Can you have a . in a module name like that without causing confusion, it kinda looks weird but it the best IMO. - log4j-javaio - log4j-javaio-bridge ? Gary On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > Using the name "streams" might be confusing the Java 1.8 streams (aka > lazily evaluated functions/map-reduce). I'd almost suggest javaio or jio or > something similar to emphasise the compatibility. > > > On 2 September 2014 09:22, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should the new module name/ID be: >> >> - log4j-streams >> - log4j-streaming >> - log4j-<your suggestion> >> >> ? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
